I remember doing a similar thing for the FAForever project, but we did it without a lawyer (and eventually decided to not do it in Germany because too much hassle). So I’m curious: is this draft assumed to be sufficient to become considered sufficient “Gemeinnützig nach deutscher AO” by the lawyer? We were on a lost cause due to supporting gaming, but we read up a lot.
One thing I remember was, that we added a dedicated clause for what happens if the e.V. dissolves itself, making sure that all property is gifted to another association preferably already considered “gemeinnützig”.
Second thing is, that the goals of the association are very narrowly specified to a product. I would expand it to “process management” in general emphasizing on a more broader usage for “the world”.
Third thing: I recall that you need to already lay out that general meetings are to be held online if you want to do such a thing. Law on that has changed a little, but I would recommend going full online right in the statutes? Unless that is not desired.
I throw the whole thing in ChatGPT and it finds a lot more things. I will not list them here, everybody can do that. But it pointed out the same things a nd a little bit more about payment of the board members and brand usage.
